As a response to the Covid-19 outbreak, Ofcom is providing a range of information about how people are getting news and information about the crisis.
This page contains results from the first twenty weeks of the survey. You can also view the latest findings and our interactive data portal.
Week 47
Fieldwork took place 12-14 February, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. During this week, all nations remained under lockdown and the number of people who received a first dose of a coronavirus vaccine passed 13 million.
Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus
- In the last week, nine in ten people (88%) said they accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day. This was a similar proportion to last month (89%) but a decrease from week one (99%).
- Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus, used by nine in ten people (87%) in the last week. Of these people, 65% said it was their most important news source.
- Almost nine in ten social media users (85%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the government.
- One in eight people (12%) shared news or information about the coronavirus via social media posts in the last week.
- Most people (85%) who shared news or information about the coronavirus from any source did so to inform family, friends and colleagues by sharing information that might be relevant or helpful to them.
Misinformation related to the coronavirus
- Three in ten people (29%) said they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week. This was a decrease from last month, when 32% of people said they had seen similar claims.
- One in four people (27%) were unsure whether or not they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, this was the same proportion as the previous month.
- In the last week, the most-seen claim about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading was that ‘the number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’. This claim was chosen from a select list and was seen by 21% of the people who came across claims which could be considered false or misleading. Six in ten (60%) people saw at least one of the claims which could be considered false or misleading, a decrease from last month where 63% of people saw at least one claim.
- Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, 23% said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue. This was a similar proportion to last month (20%).
- Six in ten people (62%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting about the coronavirus, a similar proportion to last month (61%).
- Most people (82%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’. A higher proportion of people agreed with this statement this month compared to last month (79%). However, one in five (18%) people also agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’.
- Just over half (55%) of respondents said that they had seen posts on social media with warnings or notices that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue in the last week.
We have also published the following analysis:
Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (February 2021) (PDF, 235.1 KB)
Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (February 2021) (PDF, 497.9 KB)
Ethnicity key findings
The findings below examine differences by ethnicity in the consumption of, and attitudes towards, news about the coronavirus.
These findings combine our fieldwork data from week 29 (October), week 33 (November) and week 37 (December). During these months, each nation implemented restrictions ranging from a tiered or levelled approach to full national lockdowns, and the number of confirmed coronavirus cases in the UK surpassed 1 million.
Consumption of news and information
- During the period October-December, most White respondents (88%) and people from a minority ethnic background (84%) accessed news or information about coronavirus at least once a day.
- Traditional media was the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus by both White respondents (86%) and people from a minority ethnic background (75%).
- Half of people from a minority ethnic background (50%), including 52% of Black respondents and 53% of Asian respondents, used social media as a source of news or information about the coronavirus, compared to one in three (33%) White respondents. People from a minority ethnic background (21%) were also more likely to share information about coronavirus on social media than White respondents (11%).
- People from a minority ethnic background (26%) were twice as likely as White respondents (11%) to say that they rely more on people they know, people in their local area or people on social media for information about coronavirus. White respondents (57%) were more likely than people from a minority ethnic background (35%) to say that they rely more on media or official sources for information about the coronavirus.
Misinformation
- People from a minority ethnic background (34%), including 34% of Asian respondents and 24% of Black respondents, were more likely than White respondents (31%) to say they had come across information or news about the coronavirus that could be considered false or misleading. White respondents (28%) were more likely than people from a minority ethnic background (23%) to say that they did not know whether they had come across this sort of information.
- People from a minority ethnic background (56%), including 61% of Asian respondents, were more likely than White respondents (39%) to do something after seeing information that could be considered false or misleading, such as fact checking (done by 21% of people from a minority ethnic background and 12% of White respondents).
- Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, people from a minority ethnic background (43%) were almost twice as likely as White respondents (24%) to agree that seeing these claims made them think twice about the issue.
- People from a minority ethnic background (45%) were more likely than White respondents (35%) to be concerned about the amount of false or misleading information they may be getting about coronavirus themselves.
- People from a minority ethnic background (60%) were more likely than White respondents (49%) to come across content on social media that had warning or notices saying that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue. When they came across these warnings or notices, 63% of people from a minority ethnic background said they clicked through to the content, compared to 51% of White respondents.
- White respondents (81%) were more likely to agree with the statement, 'I think that untrue stories or items about Coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media' than people from a minority ethnic background (74%).
- People from a minority ethnic background (32%) were more likely to agree with the statement, 'I think that people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about Coronavirus, even if it might not be true' than White respondents (19%).
- People from a minority ethnic background (26%) were more likely to agree with the statement, 'I think it’s OK for untrue stories about Coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform' than White respondents (18%).
Week 43
Fieldwork took place 15-17 January, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days, with all nations being under lockdown during this period.
Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus
- In the last week, nine in ten people (89%) accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day. This was an increase from last month, where 86% of people accessed news about the coronavirus once a day, but a decrease from week one (99%).
- Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus, used by nine in ten people (86%) in the last week. Of these people, 65% said it was their most important news source.
- Eight in ten social media users (82%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the government.
- One in seven people (14%) shared news or information about the coronavirus via social media posts in the last week, an increase from 11% last month.
Misinformation related to the coronavirus
- One in three people (32%) said they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week. This was an increase from last month, where 29% of people said they had seen similar claims.
- One in four people (27%) were unsure whether or not they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week.
- In the last week, the most-seen claim about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading was images or videos of empty hospitals, shown via social media posts as evidence that the coronavirus has been exaggerated. These images or videos were seen by 30% of the people who came across claims which could be considered false or misleading.
- Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in five (20%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue. This was a lower proportion compared to last month (25%).
- Six in ten people (61%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting about the coronavirus, the same proportion as last month.
- Most people (79%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’, but one in five (20%) also agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’
- Half (52%) of respondents said that they had seen posts on social media with warnings or notices that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue in the last week.
We have also published the following analysis:
Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (January 2021) (PDF, 259.4 KB)
Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (January 2021) (PDF, 557.7 KB)
Children's News Consumption Survey: Covid-19 November/December 2020 key findings
As part of our 2020 News Consumption in the UK study, we asked around 500 12-15-year-olds about their use of, and attitudes towards, news content across different platforms during the Covid-19 outbreak between 1 and 20 April 2020. This period corresponds approximately with weeks three and four of the first UK ‘lockdown’. Between 24 November and 7 December 2020, we asked another 500 12-15 year-olds about their use of and attitudes to news content as the Covid-19 pandemic continued.
- In November/December 2020 93% of 12-15s said they accessed news and information about Covid-19 in the last week, a small decrease from April 2020 (96%).
- On average, 12-15s were using fewer sources for news about the coronavirus (3.7) than in April (4.5).
- 56% of 12-15s said they got news and information about the pandemic from their family (vs 67% in April), 27% used BBC TV (vs 49% in April) and 17% used ITV (vs 30% in April).
- Only ’school or teacher’ saw increased usage from April (17%) to November/December (37%).
- Just over half of 12-15s (54%) agreed that there was too much in the news about the coronavirus, up from 43% in April, and 62% agreed that they found it hard to know what was true and what was false about the coronavirus, up from 52% in April.
- In November/December 2020 we asked 12-15s whether they relied on the media and official sources or people they know (such as friends or family), including on social media, for news about the coronavirus. 42% said they relied completely/mostly on media or official sources, 26% relied equally on media and official sources, and people they know, and 31% relied completely/mostly on people they knew.
Week 37
Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus
- In week 37, nine in ten people (86%) accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day, compared to almost everyone in week one (99%).
- Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus (83%). Of these respondents, 65% said it was their most important news source.
- Eight in ten social media users (81%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the government.
- One in ten (11%) people shared news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts this month which was the same proportion as last month.
Misinformation related to the coronavirus
- One in three people (29%) said they came across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, which is a decline from 33% in week 33.
- Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in four (25%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue.
- Six in ten respondents (61%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting about Covid-19.
- Most respondents (79%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’, but one in five (21%) also agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’.
We have also published the following analysis:
Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (December 2020) (PDF, 219.8 KB)
Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (December 2020) (PDF, 394.2 KB)
Week 33
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- Nine in ten people (90%) accessed news about Covid-19 at least once a day which compares to almost everyone (99%) in week one.
- Since week one, traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (85% of respondents used traditional sources in week 33 compared to 93% in week one).
- In week 33, eight in ten social media users (82%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about Covid-19 from official sources, such as health organisations or the government, while on social media.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- One in three people (33%) said they came across claims about Covid-19 which could be considered false or misleading in the last week.
- Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, three in ten (28%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue (26% in week 29)
- When shown a selected list of claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in three respondents (33%) said they had seen the claim that ‘The flu alone is killing more people than coronavirus’.
- Eight in ten respondents (81%) felt that untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be shared or posted on social media.
- Six in ten respondents (61%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting about Covid-19.
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- The majority of respondents said they are still closely following government advice on the coronavirus including the ‘Stay at home as much as possible’ advice since the start of the England lockdown.
- ‘Maintaining social distancing’ (59%) and ‘Washing hands regularly and thoroughly’ (57%) were rated the two most important pieces of government advice by respondents. ‘Staying at home as much as possible’ and ‘Wearing a face mask/covering’ were also seen as important pieces of government advice, with more than half of respondents (54%) rating these as important.
- One in four respondents (24%) agreed with the statement ‘I am confused about what I should be doing in response to the coronavirus’. While the proportion of people who agreed with this has increased from week one of the lockdown (where 17% agreed), the proportion has decreased from the last round of our survey (in week 29, where 30% agreed).
Fieldwork took place 9-11 October, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days, following a week during which the reported number of Covid-19 cases increased.
Comparisons are mainly with week one of the research, when fieldwork took place on 27-29 March, just after the Prime Minister had announced lockdown measures. We also compare the results with the data from week 25, when fieldwork took place on 11-13 September, as this was the previous iteration of this fieldwork.
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- Nine in ten people (88%) accessed news about Covid-19 at least once a day in the last week, this is an increase from 84% in week 25, although it is below the high at the start of the lockdown (99% in week one). Over 65s were the most likely to access news about Covid-19 at least once a day (93%) and 16-24s were least likely (79%). One in 20 people (6%) accessed news about the pandemic at least 20 times a day (vs. 4% in week 25 and 24% in week one).
- Three in ten respondents (30%) said they are ‘trying to avoid news about the coronavirus’ (vs. 32% in week 25 and 22% in week one). Those aged 25-34 were most likely to say they are avoiding news about the coronavirus (43%). Female respondents were more likely to say they are avoiding news on the topic (34%) than male respondents (25%).
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, newspapers, radio) remained the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (84% in week 29 and week 25 vs. 93% in week one) and the most important source of news and information to users (64% in week 29 and week 25 vs. 71% in week one). Over 65s were more likely to use traditional media (94%) compared to 18-24s (72%).
- Compared to week one, use of social media as a source of information about the pandemic decreased (34% in week 29 and 38% in week 25 vs. 49% in week one), as did use of closed messenger groups (9% in week 29 and 25 vs. 15% in week one). Social media was still being used more among younger people than older people, with just over half (53%) of 16-24s using social media for pandemic information compared to 18% of over 65s. Social media was also considered a more important source of news about the coronavirus by younger respondents (12% of 18-24s, compared to only 1% of over-65s, considered it their most important news source). There was a decrease in sharing news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts (13% in week 29 and 25 vs. 25% in week one) or by writing in closed messenger groups (16% in week 29 and 14% in week 25 vs. 34% in week one). Around a quarter of people (26%) said they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19, either online or by word of mouth in the last week, compared to 11% in week one.
- In week 20, respondents were asked whether they agreed with the statement ‘I feel confident that I understand the statistics and data used to provide the number of coronavirus cases and deaths’. In week 29, around half (52%) of respondents agreed with the statement and 22% disagreed, similar to the results in week 25 (where 55% agreed and 20% disagreed). As in week 25, male respondents were more likely (58%) than female respondents (47%) to agree with the statement. In week 25, people living in Scotland (66%) were more likely to agree with this statement but in week 29 the level of agreement was similar across all nations and regions.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- In week 29, 32% of respondents said they came across false or misleading information about Covid-19 in the last week. This is an increase from week 25 where 27% of respondent said that they had come across false or misleading information, although this is still below the peak of 50% in weeks three and five (in April) and 46% in week one. 18-24s were the most likely to come across false or misleading information (36%) compared with 27% of 45-54s. Over a third of (35%) of male respondents came across false or misleading information compared to 28% of female respondents. Just 4% of those who saw misleading information in the last week said they forwarded or shared it (vs. 7% in week one).
- The most common piece of misinformation respondents came across in the last week (from a select list) is ‘face masks/ coverings offer no protection/ or are harmful’. Three in ten (27%) of respondents said they came across this claim. One in five (20%) of respondents reported coming across claims that ‘The number of deaths linked to Coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’, compared to 27% in week 20 when it was first asked. A similar proportion (18%) came across claims about a ‘lower number of cases in reality than being reported’. In week 29, we asked respondents for the first time if they had come across the claim that ‘The common cold can produce a positive Coronavirus test’; less than one in ten (8%) of respondents reported to have seen this.
- There was a decrease in respondents coming across other claims about coronavirus. Only 13% of respondents reported seeing the claim that ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’, compared to 21% in week 14 (in June) and 50% in week three (in April) when we first asked about this. One in ten (9%) respondents came across claims about ‘Injecting disinfectant/ bleach’, a decrease from 22% in week ten (in May). Just under one in five (17%) of respondents came across ‘Claims about potential dangers of a Coronavirus vaccination’ in line with results from week nine (in May) when it was first asked (18%).
- A quarter (26%) of respondents said that seeing false or misleading information has made them think twice about the issue, which is in line with week 25 27%. Those aged 25-34 were most likely to say that false or misleading information had made them think twice (37%) compared to 17% of 55-64s.
- In week 29, 81% of respondents who use social media said they had come across information about the coronavirus from official sources in the form of banners, pop-ups and upfront notices (either each time (16%), most times (30%) or sometimes (34%) when they went onto social media). Half of respondents (47%) that use social media said that they had come across ‘news/ info that have warnings/ notices from the platform attached, saying that the info may be untrustworthy/ untrue’ (either each time (7%), most times (16%) or sometimes (24%) when they went onto social media). Of those that came across these warnings/ notices about content, over half (55%) reported clicking through to view the content being flagged in this way.
- Most respondents agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’ (81%) with only 7% disagreeing. One in five (20%) of respondents agreed that ‘people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about the coronavirus, even if it might not be true’. Three in ten (29%) of 25-34s agreed with this compared to only 8% of over 65s. One in five (18%) of respondents also agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about Coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/ untrue by the social media platform’.
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- In week 29, three in ten (30%) respondents agreed with the statement ‘I am confused about what I should be doing in response to the coronavirus’. This was in line with week 25 (31%) and up from 17% in week one. Four in ten (38%) of 18-24s agreed with the statement compared to 26% of over 65s. Respondents in the North West (40%) and Wales (40%) were more likely to agree with this statement than other respondents.
- Four in ten (38%) said they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about the coronavirus’, a similar proportion to week 25 and week one (both 40%). More female respondents (43%) said they find it hard to know what’s true or false compared to male respondents (33%), and 25-34s were the most likely age group to agree with the statement (44%). There were no significant differences in the responses to this statement from ABC1 or C2DE households (38% vs. 40%).
- The NHS remained one of the most trusted sources for information on Covid-19. In week 29, 95% of those who said they use the NHS for information said they trust it, the same proportion as in week 25 and week one. A clear majority of respondents using official sources continued to trust the information provided by official scientists (80% in week 29 and 88% in week 25 vs. 90% in week one), local health services (83% and 93% vs. 92%) and the WHO (92% and 86% vs. 94%). Three quarters (74%) of respondents trusted information provided by the UK Government, down from nine in ten (91%) in week one.
- A quarter of respondents (27%) said they think ‘the mainstream media is exaggerating the seriousness of the coronavirus’, a similar result to week 25 (25%) compared to 17% in week one. Male and female respondents were equally likely to agree with this statement (27% vs. 26%). A third of those aged 25-34 agreed with the statement compared to one in five (19%) over 65s. Four in ten (38%) people living in Yorkshire and Humberside agreed with this statement compared to only 21% of people living in the South East.
- Six in ten respondents (61%) continued to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’. This has decreased over time since week one where 86% of respondents agreed with this statement. Those over 65 were most likely to agree the crisis is showing positive sides to society (64%) compared to 56% of 25-34s.
- In week 20, respondents were asked for the first time whether they would ‘agree to be vaccinated against the Coronavirus if there was a vaccine approved by the NHS available tomorrow’. In week 29, six in ten respondents (62%) agreed with the statement, a decrease from week 25 where 68% of respondents agreed. In week 29, 18% of respondents disagreed with this statement which is in line with the responses from week 25 (17%). Over 65s were the most likely to agree with the statement (80%) compared to 52% of 35-54s.
- In week 25, parents were asked for the first time if ‘on balance, they were comfortable that their child/children is/are back at school’ and just over half (55%) of parents agreed. In week 29, 58% of parents agreed with this statement while one in five (19%) of parents disagreed.
- Nearly all respondents said they are closely following official guidance about regular handwashing (88% in week 29 and 87% in week 25 vs. 96% in week one), practising social distancing (93% and 92% vs. 98% in week one) and wearing a face mask/ covering where relevant (94% and 93% vs. 93% in week 20). Over 65s were most likely to say they are following advice on social distancing (97%) compared to 85% of 16-24s.
- Finally, respondents reported ‘Maintaining social distancing’ (67%) and ‘Washing hands regularly and thoroughly’ (63%) as the two most important pieces of official advice (combining 1st, 2nd and 3rd rankings). Six in ten respondents (60%) thought that wearing a face mask/ covering is important, which is almost three times more than in week 14 (21%) following the announcement that face coverings should be worn when travelling on public transport or going into shops.
We have also published the following analysis:
Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (October 2020) (PDF, 217.8 KB)
Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (October 2020) (PDF, 363.4 KB)
Week 25
Fieldwork took place 11-13 September, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. Comparisons are mainly with week one of the research, when fieldwork took place on 27-29 March, just after the Prime Minister had announced lockdown measures.
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- More than eight in ten people (84%) are accessing news about Covid-19 at least once a day (vs. 99% in week one). Over 65s are most likely to access news about Covid-19 at least once a day (91%) and 16-24s are least likely (77%). Less than one in 20 (4%) are now accessing news about the pandemic at least 20 times a day (vs. 24% in week one).
- Three in ten respondents (32%) say they are ‘trying to avoid news about the coronavirus’ (vs. 22% in week one). Those aged 25-34 are most likely to say they are avoiding news about the coronavirus (45%). There is no difference by gender during this week, whereas previously, we have seen that female respondents are more likely than male respondents to say they are avoiding news on the topic.
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, newspapers, radio) remain the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (84% in week 25 vs. 93% in week one) and the most important source of news and information to users (64% in week 25 vs. 71% in week one). Over 65s are more likely to use traditional media (96%) compared to 18-24s (73%).
- Compared to week one, use of social media as a source of information about the pandemic has decreased (38% in week 25 vs. 49% in week one), as has use of closed messenger groups (9% vs. 15%). However, for both of these sources, they have increased against week 20. Social media is still being used more amongst the younger people than older people - half of 16-24s compared to 22% of over 65s. It is also considered as a more important source of news about the coronavirus; 15% of 18-24s, compared to only 1% of over-65s consider it their most important news source. There has also been a decrease in sharing news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts (13% in week 25 vs. 25% in week one) or by writing in closed messenger groups (14% vs. 34%). A quarter (24%) now say they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19, either online or by word of mouth in the last week, compared to 11% in week one.
- In week 20, respondents were asked whether they agreed with the statement ‘I feel confident that I understand the statistics and data used to provide the number of coronavirus cases and deaths’. In week 25, just over half (55%) of respondents agreed with the statement and 20% disagreed which are similar to the results in week 20. As in week 20, male respondents were more likely (61%) than female respondents (50%) to agree with the statement. People living in Scotland (66%) are also more likely to agree with this statement.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- In week 25, 27% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information about Covid-19 in the last week; there has been a gradual decrease from a peak of 50% in weeks three and five and from 46% in week one. 25-34s are the most likely to come across false or misleading information (36%) compared with 21% of over 65s. Almost a third of (31%) of male respondents came across false or misleading information compared to 23% of female respondents. Just 4% of those who saw misleading information in the last week say they forwarded or shared it (vs. 7% in week one).
- The most common piece of misinformation respondents came across in the last week (from a select list) is ‘face masks/ coverings offer no protection/ or are harmful’. Three in ten (28%) of respondents said they came across this claim. One in five (21%) of respondents reported coming across claims that ‘The number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ compared to 27% in week 20 when it was first asked. A similar proportion (18%) were also coming across claims about a ‘lower number of cases in reality than being reported’.
- There has been a decrease in respondents coming across ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’ with only 15% of respondent reporting seeing it in week 25 compared to 21% in week 14 and 50% in week three when it was first asked. One in 20 (6%) respondents came across claims about ‘Injecting disinfectant/ bleach’, a decrease from 22% in week ten. One in five (20%) of respondents had come across ‘Claims about potential dangers of a coronavirus vaccination’ in line with results from week nine when it was first asked (18%). Less than one in ten (7%) came across ‘schoolchildren can be tested and detained without their parents’ permission’.
- A quarter (27%) of respondents say that seeing false or misleading information has made them think twice about the issue, which is in line with week 20 (25%). Those aged 25-34 were most likely to say that false or misleading information had made them think twice (42%) compared to 19% of 45-54s.
- In week 25, 82% of respondents who use social media say they came across information about the coronavirus from official sources in the form of banners, pop-ups and upfront notices (either each time (15%), most times (27%) or sometimes (41%) when they go onto social media). Half of respondents (49%) that use social media said that they have come across ‘news/ info that have warnings/ notices from the platform attached, saying that the info may be untrustworthy/ untrue’. Of those that came across these warnings/ notices about content half (49%) reported clicking through to view the content being flagged in this way.
- Most respondents agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’ (82%) with only 7% disagreeing. One in five (21%) of respondents agreed that ‘people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about the coronavirus, even if it might not be true’. A third (34%) of 18-24s agree that people and organisations have the right to say what they want about the coronavirus even if it’s untrue compared to only 9% of over 65s. One in five (19%) of respondents also agree that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they flagged as potentially untrustworthy/ untrue by the social media platform’.
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- Almost a third (31%) of respondents agree with the statement ‘I am confused about what I should be doing in response to the coronavirus’. This is an increase from 17% in week one. One in four (42%) of 18-24s agree with the statement compared to 26% of over 65s.
- Four in ten (40%) say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about the coronavirus’, which is exactly the same proportion in week one. More female respondents (45%) say they find it hard to know what’s true or false compared to male respondents (35%). Almost half of 25-34s were the most likely to agree with the statement (48%). Over a third (37%) of ABC1 households say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about the coronavirus’ compared to 43% of in C2DE households.
- The NHS remains one of the most trusted sources for information on Covid-19. The same proportion in week 25 who use it for information say they trust it compared to week one (95%). A clear majority of respondents using official sources continue to trust the information provided by official scientists (88% in week 25 vs. 90% in week one), local health services (93% vs. 92%) and the WHO (86% vs. 94%). Whilst almost eight in ten (77%) trust information provided by the UK Government, this has decreased from nine in ten (91%) in week one).
- A quarter of respondents (25%) say they think ‘the mainstream media is exaggerating the seriousness of the coronavirus’, compared to 17% in week one. Three in ten male respondents agreed with this statement, compared to 20% of female respondents. A third of those aged 25-44 agreed with the statement compared to one in six (17%) over 65s. A third (33%) of people living in Yorkshire and Humberside agreed, whereas only 16% of people living in Scotland agreed with this statement.
- Most respondents (69%) continue to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’ (although it is a decrease vs. 86% in week one). Those aged 55-64 are most likely to agree the crisis is showing positive sides to society (77%) compared to 63% of 18-24s.
- In week 20, respondents were asked whether they would be ‘comfortable to be vaccinated against the coronavirus if there was a vaccine approved by the NHS available tomorrow’. In week 25, two thirds of respondents (68%) agreed with the statement and 17% disagreed which is in line with week 20. Over 65s were the most likely to agree with the statement (82%) compared to 56% of 25-34s.
- In week 25, parents were asked if ‘on balance, they were comfortable that their child/children is/are back at school’. Just over half (55%) of parents agreed with this statement, and one in five (20%) disagreed.
- Nearly all respondents still say they are closely following official guidance about regular handwashing (87% in week 25 vs. 96% in week one), practising social distancing (92% vs. 98%) and wearing a face mask/ covering where relevant (93% which is the same as in week 20). Over 65s are most likely to say they are following advice on social distancing (98%) compared to 84% of 16-24s.
- Finally, respondents reported ‘Maintaining social distancing when outside’ (71%) and ‘Washing hands regularly and thoroughly’ (67%) as the two most important pieces of official advice (combining 1st, 2nd and 3rd rankings). Over half of respondents (56%) think that wearing a face mask/ covering is important, which has more than doubled since week 14 (21%).
Fieldwork took place 7–9 August, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. Comparisons are with week one of the research, when fieldwork took place on 27–29 March, just after the Prime Minister had announced lockdown measures.
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- More than eight in ten people (83%) are accessing news about Covid-19 at least once a day (vs. 99% in week one). Over 65s are most likely to access news about Covid-19 at least once a day (94%) and 16-34s are least likely (75%). Less than one in 20 (4%) are now accessing news about the pandemic at least 20 times a day (vs. 24% in week one).
- Three in ten respondents (29%) say they are ‘trying to avoid news about the coronavirus’ (vs. 22% in week one). Those aged 18-24 are most likely to say they are avoiding news about the coronavirus (42%). Female respondents (32%) are more likely than male respondents (27%) to say they are avoiding news on the topic.
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, newspapers, radio) remain both the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (82% in week 20 vs. 93% in week one) and the most important source of news and information to users (62% in week 20 vs. 71% in week one). Over 65s are more likely to use traditional media (93%) compared to 16-24s (67%).
- Compared to week one, use of social media as a source of information about the pandemic has decreased (29% in week 20 vs. 49% in week one), as has use of closed messenger groups (5% vs. 15%). Almost half (44%) 16-24s use social media as a source of news about the coronavirus compared to only 15% of over 65s. Social media is considered as their most important source of news about the coronavirus by 11% of 16-24s, which is higher than for any other age group, and only 2% of over-65s consider it their most important news source. There has also been a decrease in sharing news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts (9% in week 20 vs. 25% in week one) or by writing in closed messenger groups (11% vs. 34%). A third (32%) now say they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19, either online or by word of mouth in the last week, compared to 11% in week one.
- In week 20 respondents were asked whether they agreed with the statement “I feel confident that I understand the statistics and data used to provide the number of coronavirus cases”. Just over half (52%) of respondents agreed with the statement and 22% disagreed. Male respondents were more likely (57%) than female respondents (47%) to agree with the statement.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- In week 20, 27% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information about Covid-19 in the last week; there has been a gradual decrease from a peak of 50% in weeks three and five and from 46% in week one. 16-24s are the most likely to come across false or misleading information (32%) compared with 27% of over 65s. Just 3% of those who saw misleading information in the last week say they forwarded or shared it (vs. 7% in week one).
- The most common piece of misinformation respondents came across in the last week (from a select list) is ‘face masks/ coverings offer no protection/ or are harmful’. Three in ten (30%) of respondents said they came across this claim. There has been a decrease in respondents coming across ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’ with only 15% of respondent reporting seeing it in week 20 compared to 21% in week 14 and 50% in week three when it was first asked. One in five (22%) of respondents reported coming across claims that ‘The number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’, 18-24s were most likely to see this claim (27%). One in ten (9%) respondents came across claims about ‘Injecting disinfectant/ bleach’, a decrease from 22% in week ten. Less than one in five (16%) of respondents had come across ‘Claims about potential dangers of a coronavirus vaccination’ in line with results from week nine when it was first asked (18%).
- A quarter (25%) of respondents say that seeing false or misleading information has made them think twice about the issue. Younger people (18-34s) were most likely to say that false or misleading information had made them think twice (35%) compared to only 16% of over 65s.
- In week 20, 73% of respondents who use social media say they came across information about the coronavirus from official sources in the form of banners, pop-ups and upfront notices (either each time/most times or sometimes when they use social media). 45% of respondents that use social media said that they have come across “news/ info that have warnings/ notices from the platform attached, saying that the info may be untrustworthy/ untrue”. Of those that came across these warnings/ notices about content half (51%) reported clicking through to view the content being flagged in this way.
- Most respondents agreed that “untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media” (82%) with only 7% disagreeing. One in five (19%) of respondents agreed that “people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about the coronavirus, even if it might not be true”. Over a quarter (28%) of 18-24s agree that people and organisations have the right to say what they want about the coronavirus even if it’s untrue compared to only 9% of over 65s. 17% of respondents agree that “it’s OK for untrue stories about coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they flagged as potentially untrustworthy/ untrue by the social media platform”.
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- Around one quarter (27%) of respondents agree with the statement ‘I am confused about what I should be doing in response to the coronavirus’. This is an increase from 17% in week one. More than a third (36%) of 18-24s agree with the statement compared to 22% of over 65s.
- Four in ten (38%) say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about the coronavirus’, similar to the proportion in week one (40%). Four in ten female respondents (42%) say they find it hard to know what’s true or false, compared to 32% of male respondents. 35-44s were the most likely to agree with the statement (43%). 34% of those in ABC1 households say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about the coronavirus’ compared to 42% of those in C2DE households.
- A quarter of respondents (23%) say they think ‘the mainstream media is exaggerating the seriousness of the coronavirus’, compared to 17% in week one. Over a quarter (27%) of male respondents agreed with this statement, compared to 20% of female respondents. One in eight (14%) over 65s agreed with the statement compared to 31% of those aged 25-34.
- Most respondents (69%) continue to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’ (although it is a decrease vs. 86% in week one). Those aged over 65 are most likely to agree the crisis is showing positive sides to society (77%) compared to 59% of 18-24s.
- In week 20 respondents were asked whether they would be “comfortable to be vaccinated against the coronavirus if there was a vaccine approved by the NHS available tomorrow”. Two thirds of respondents agreed with the statement and 15% disagreed. Over 65s were the most likely to agree with the statement (83%) compared to 58% of 35-44s.
- Nearly all respondents still say they are closely following official guidance about regular handwashing (88% in week 20 vs. 96% in week one), practising social distancing (92% vs. 98%) and wearing a face mask/ covering where relevant (93%). Over 65s are most likely to say they are following advice on social distancing (98%) compared to 82% of 18-24s.
- Finally, respondents reported ‘Maintaining social distancing when outside’ (71%) and ‘Washing hands regularly and thoroughly’ (69%) as the two most important pieces of official advice (combining 1st, 2nd and 3rd rankings). Over half of respondents (52%) think that wearing a face mask/ covering is important, which has more than doubled since week 14 (21%).
We have also published the following analysis:
Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (PDF, 250.3 KB)
Week 14
Fieldwork took place 26-28 June, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. Comparisons are with week one of the research, when fieldwork took place on 27-29 March, just after the Prime Minister had announced lockdown measures.
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- More than eight in ten people (85%) are still accessing news about Covid-19 at least once a day (vs. 99% in week one). Over 55s are most likely to access news about Covid-19 at least once a day (91%) and 16-24s are least likely (77%). Less than one in 20 (4%) are now accessing news about the pandemic at least 20 times a day (vs. 24% in week one).
- Around a third of respondents (32%) say they are ‘trying to avoid news about the coronavirus’ (vs. 22% in week one). As in previous weeks those aged 25-34 are most likely to say they are avoiding news about the coronavirus (46%). Female respondents (35%) are more likely than male respondents (29%) to say they are avoiding news on the topic.
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, newspapers, radio) remain both the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (87% in week 14 vs. 93% in week one) and the most important source of news and information to users (67% in week 14 vs. 71% in week one). Over 55s are more likely to use traditional media (94%) compared to 16-24s (81%).
- Compared to week one, use of social media as a source of information about the pandemic has decreased (37% in week 14 vs. 49% in week one), as has use of closed messenger groups (6% vs. 15%). More than half (56%) 16-24s use social media as a source of news about the coronavirus compared to only 19% of over 65s. Social media is considered as their most important source of news about the coronavirus by 14% of 16-24s, which is higher than for any other age group, and only 1% of over-65s consider it their most important news source. There has also been a decrease in sharing news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts (13% in week 14 vs. 25% in week one) or by writing in closed messenger groups (17% vs. 34%). A fifth (21%) now say they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19, either online or by word of mouth in the last week, compared to 11% in week one.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- In week 14, 29% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information about Covid-19 in the last week; this is down from a peak of 50% in weeks three and five and from 46% in week one. 16-24s are the most likely to come across false or misleading information (38%) compared with 24% of over 55s. Those in ABC1 households are also more likely (32%) to come across misleading information than those in C2DE households (25%). Just 4% of those who saw misleading information in the last week say they forwarded or shared it (vs. 7% in week one).
- The most common piece of misinformation respondents came across in the last week (from a select list) is ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’. There has been a decrease in the proportion of respondents coming across this, from 50% in week three when it was first asked, to 21% in week 14. A quarter (26%) of 16-24s they say have come across ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’ compared to 17% of over 65s.
- In week 14, 75% of respondents who use social media say they came across information about the coronavirus from official sources in the form of banners, pop-ups and upfront notices (either each time/most times or sometimes when they use social media). 41% of respondents that use social media said that they have come across “news/ info that have warnings/ notices from the platform attached, saying that the info may be untrustworthy/ untrue”.
- A quarter (27%) of respondents say that seeing false or misleading information has made them think twice about the issue. Younger people (16-24s) were most likely to say that false or misleading information had made them think twice (36%) compared to only 20% of over 65s.
- Most respondents agreed that “untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media” (84%) with only 6% disagreeing. Only 17% of respondents agreed that “people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about the coronavirus, even if it might not be true”. Almost a quarter (24%) of 25-34s agree that people and organisations have the right to say what they want about the coronavirus even if it’s untrue compared to only 9% of over 65s. Just under a fifth (18%) of respondents agree that “it’s OK for untrue stories about Coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they flagged as potentially untrustworthy/ untrue by the social media platform”.
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- Around one quarter (24%) of respondents agree with the statement ‘I am confused about what I should be doing in response to the coronavirus’. This is an increase from 17% in week one. Three in ten (30%) of 16-24s agree with the statement compared to 24% of over 65s.
- The NHS remains the most trusted source for information on Covid-19. More than nine in ten adults who use it for information say they trust it (91% in week 14 vs. 95% in week one). A clear majority of respondents using official sources continue to trust the information provided by official scientists (86% in week 14 vs. 90% in week one), local health services (82% vs. 92%), the WHO (81% vs. 94%) and the UK government (77% vs. 89%).
- A third (33%) say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about the coronavirus’, lower than the proportion in week one (40%). Four in ten female respondents (38%) say they find it hard to know what’s true or false, compared to 28% of male respondents. 39% of 25-34s agreed with the statement, compared to 31% of over 65s. 30% of those in ABC1 households say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about the coronavirus’ compared to 37% of those in C2DE households.
- Nearly all respondents still say they are closely following official guidance about regular handwashing (88% in week 14 vs. 96% in week one) and practising social distancing (93% vs. 98%). Over 55s are most likely to say they are following advice on social distancing (97%) compared to 83% of 18-24s.
- Respondents reported "Staying at home as much as possible’ (60%), ‘Maintaining social distancing when outside’ (66%) and ‘Washing hands regularly and thoroughly’ (69%) as the three most important pieces of official advice (combining 1st, 2nd and 3rd rankings). Over 55s say they think social distancing is most important (74%) compared to 58% of 18-24s. Respondents aged over 65 (72%) thought handwashing the most important compared to 61% of 18-24s.
- A fifth of respondents (20%) say they think ‘the mainstream media is exaggerating the seriousness of the coronavirus’, compared to 17% in week one. Almost a quarter (23%) of male respondents agreed with this statement, compared to 17% of female respondents. One in seven (13%) over 65s agreed with the statement compared to 25% of those aged 25-34.
Finally, most respondents (75%) continue to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’ (vs. 86% in week one). Those aged over 65 are most likely to agree the crisis is showing positive sides to society (80%) compared to 70% of 16-24s.
We have also published the following pieces of analysis:
Covid-19 news and information: summary of views about misinformation (PDF, 284.1 KB)
Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (PDF, 303.1 KB)
Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (PDF, 191.4 KB)
Week 12
Fieldwork took place 12-15 June, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. Comparisons are with week one of the research, when fieldwork took place on 27-29 March, just after the Prime Minister had announced lockdown measures.
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- Almost nine in ten respondents (89%) are still accessing news about Covid-19 at least once a day (vs. 99% in week one). Over 55s are most likely to access news about Covid-19 at least once a day (94%) and 16-24s are least likely (81%). Only one in 20 (5%) are now accessing news about the pandemic at least 20 times a day (vs. 24% in week one).
- Around a third of respondents (34%) say they are ‘trying to avoid news about the coronavirus’ (vs. 22% in week one). As in previous weeks those aged 25-34 are most likely to say they are avoiding news about the coronavirus (44%). Female respondents (37%) are more likely than male respondents (30%) to say they are avoiding news on the topic.
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, newspapers, radio) remain both the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (89% in week 12 vs. 93% in week one) and the most important source of news and information to users (69% in week 12 vs. 71% in week one). Over 55s are more likely to use traditional media (96%) compared to 16-24s (77%). Over 55s are also more likely to trust traditional media (82%) compared to 25-34s who trust it the least (51%).
- Compared to week one, use of social media as a source of information about the pandemic has decreased (38% in week 12 vs. 49% in week one), as has use of closed messenger groups (8% vs. 15%). More than six in ten (63%) 16-24s use social media as a source of news about the coronavirus vs only 18% of over 65s. Social media is considered as their most important source of news about the coronavirus by 12% of 16-24s, higher than for any other age group, and only 1% of over-65s consider it their most important news source. There has also been a decrease in sharing news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts (13% in week 12 vs. 25% in week one) or by writing in closed messenger groups (18% vs. 34%). Almost a quarter (23%) now say they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19 either online or by word of mouth in the last week, compared to 11% in week one.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- In week 12, 30% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information about Covid-19 in the last week; this is down from a peak of 50% in weeks three and five and from 46% in week one. 16-24s are the most likely to come across false or misleading information (44%) compared with 24% of over 35s. Those in ABC1 households are also more likely (32%) to come across misleading information than those in C2DE households (26%). Just 5% of those who saw misleading information in the last week say they forwarded or shared it (vs. 7% in week one).
- The most common piece of misinformation respondents came across in the last week (from a select list) is ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’. There has been a decrease in the proportion of respondents coming across this, from 50% in week three when it was first asked, to 22% in week 12. Almost a third (32%) of 16-24s they say have come across ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’ compared to 17% of over 65s.
- In week 12, 75% of respondents who use social media say they came across information about the coronavirus from official sources in the form of banners, pop-ups and upfront notices (either each time/most times or sometimes when they use social media).
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- Around one quarter (24%) of respondents agree with the statement ‘I am confused about what I should be doing in response to the coronavirus’. This is an increase from 17% in week one. A third (32%) of 25-34s agree with the statement compared to 21% of over 65s.
- The NHS remains the most trusted source for information on Covid-19. More than nine in ten adults who use it for information say they trust it (91% in week 12 vs. 95% in week one). A clear majority of respondents using official sources continue to trust the information provided by official scientists (84% in week 12 vs. 90% in week one), local health services (87% vs. 92%), the WHO (80% vs. 94%) and the UK government (68% vs. 89%).
- Just over four in ten respondents (43%) say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about the coronavirus’, similar to the proportion in week one (40%). More than four in ten female respondents (46%) say they find it hard to know what’s true or false, compared to 39% of male respondents. 49% of 25-34s agreed with the statement, compared to 40% of over 65s. 39% of those in ABC1 households say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about the coronavirus’ compared to 47% of those in C2DE households.
- Nearly all respondents still say they are closely following official guidance about regular handwashing (90% in week 12 vs. 96% in week one) and practising social distancing (95% vs. 98%). Over 55s are most likely to say they are following advice on social distancing (98%) compared to 91% of 18-24s.
- Respondents reported "Staying at home as much as possible’ (65%), ‘Maintaining social distancing when outside’ (68%) and ‘Washing hands regularly and thoroughly’ (68%) as the three most important pieces of official advice (combining 1st, 2nd and 3rd rankings). Over 55s say they think social distancing is most important (73%) compared to 66% of 18-24s. Respondents from C2DE backgrounds (72%) think social distancing is more important than those in ABC1 backgrounds (66%). Respondents aged over 65 (73%) thought handwashing the most important compared to 55% of 18-24s.
- Nearly a quarter of respondents (24%) say they think ‘the mainstream media is exaggerating the seriousness of the coronavirus’, compared to 17% in week one. Almost three in ten (29%) male respondents agreed with this statement, compared to 19% of female respondents. One in five (21%) over 65s agreed with the statement compared to 32% of those aged 25-34.
- Finally, most respondents (79%) continue to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’ (vs. 86% in week one). Those aged over 65 are most likely to agree the crisis is showing positive sides to society (84%) compared to 71% of 16-24s.
Week 10
Fieldwork took place 29–31 May, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. Comparisons are with week one of the research, when fieldwork took place 27–29 March, just after the Prime Minister had announced lockdown measures.
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- Nine in ten respondents (90%) are still accessing news about Covid-19 at least once a day (vs. 99% in week one). But less than one in ten (7%) are now accessing news about the pandemic at least twenty times a day (vs. 24% in week one).
- Around a third of respondents (35%) say they are ‘trying to avoid news about coronavirus’ (vs. 22% in week one). Those aged 18-24 are most likely to say they are avoiding news about Covid-19 (45%). Female respondents (39%) are more likely than male respondents (31%) to say they are avoiding news on the topic.
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, newspapers, radio) remain both the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (88% in week ten vs. 93% in week one) and the most important source of news and information to users (68% in week ten vs. 71% in week one).
- Compared to week one, use of social media as a source of information about the pandemic has decreased (38% in week ten vs. 49% in week one), as has use of closed messenger groups (7% vs. 15%). There has also been a decrease in sharing news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts (13% in week ten vs. 25% in week one) or by writing in closed messenger groups (18% vs. 34%). Almost a quarter (23%) now say they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19 either online or by word of mouth in the last week, compared to 11% in week one.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- In week ten, 38% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information about Covid-19 in the last week - this is lower than results in week one (46%). Just 4% of those who saw misleading information in the last week say they forwarded or shared it (vs. 7% in week one).
- The most common piece of misinformation respondents came across (from a select list) is ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’. There has been a decrease in the proportion of respondents coming across this, from 50% in week three when it was first asked, to 30% in week ten.
- In week ten, 76% of respondents who use social media say they came across information in the form of banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about coronavirus from official sources (either each time/most times or sometimes).
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- Around one quarter (24%) of respondents agree with the statement ‘I am confused about what I should be doing in response to coronavirus’. This is an increase from 17% in week one. Three in ten (28%) of 25-34s agree with the statement compared to 21% of over 65s.
- The NHS remains the most trusted source for information on Covid-19. More than nine in ten adults who use it for information say they trust it (92% in week ten vs. 95% in week one). A clear majority of respondents using official sources continue to trust the information provided by official scientists (87% in week ten vs. 90% in week one), local health services (86% vs. 92%), the WHO (82% vs. 94%) and the UK government (70% vs. 89%).
- Just under four in ten respondents (38%) say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about coronavirus’, similar to the proportion in week one (40%). Four in ten female respondents (41%) say they find it hard to know what’s true or false, compared to 34% of male respondents. 43% of 16-24s say that they find it hard to know what is true or false, compared to 32% of 55-64s.
- Nearly all respondents still say they are closely following official guidance about regular handwashing (90% in week ten vs. 96% in week one) and practising social distancing (96% vs. 98%).
- Respondents reported 'Staying at home as much as possible’ (70%), ‘Maintaining social distancing when outside’ (69%) and ‘Washing hands regularly and thoroughly’ (67%) as the three most important official pieces of official advice (combining 1st, 2nd and 3rd rankings).
- Nearly a quarter of respondents (23%) say they think ‘the mainstream media is exaggerating the seriousness of coronavirus’, compared to 17% in week one. A quarter of male respondents (26%) agreed with this statement, compared to 20% of female respondents. One in five (19%) of over 65s agreed with the statement compared to 27% of those aged 35-44.
- Finally, most respondents (79%) continue to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’ (vs. 86% in week one). Those aged over 65 are most likely to agree the crisis is showing positive sides to society (87%) compared to 68% of 25-34s.
We also published the following pieces of analysis. The misinformation report summarises the findings from the questions we have asked about Covid-19 related misinformation, as a contribution to the ongoing debates around the topic. We also have an update on the effects of the pandemic on online consumption.
Covid-19 news and information: summary of views about misinformation (PDF, 258.9 KB)
Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (PDF, 240.8 KB)
Week 8
Fieldwork took place 16-17 May, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. Comparisons are with week one of the research, when fieldwork took place on 27-29 March, just after the Prime Minister had addressed the nation and announced lockdown measures.
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- Nine in ten respondents (92%) are still accessing news about Covid-19 at least once a day (vs. 99% in week one). But less than one in ten (8%) are now accessing news about the pandemic at least twenty times a day (vs. 24% in week one).
- A third of respondents (33%) say they are ‘trying to avoid news about coronavirus’ (vs. 22% in week one). Those aged 25-34 are most likely to say they are avoiding news about Covid-19 (43%). Female respondents (35%) are more likely than male respondents (30%) to say they are avoiding news on the topic.
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, newspapers, radio) remain both the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (88% in week eight vs. 93% in week one) and the most important source of news and information to users (65% in week eight vs. 71% in week one). BBC services (TV, radio and online) remain the most used (78% in week eight, 82% in week one) and most important sources of information (51% in week eight, 52% in week one).
- Compared to week one, use of social media as a source of information about the pandemic has decreased (37% in week eight vs. 49% in week one), as has use of closed groups (9% vs. 15%). There has also been a decrease in sharing news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts (15% in week eight vs. 25% in week one) or by writing in closed messenger groups (21% vs. 34%). Just over a fifth (21%) now say they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19 either online or by word of mouth in the last week, compared to 11% in week one.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- In week eight, 43% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information about Covid-19 in the last week. This is slightly lower than results in week one (46%). Just 4% of those who saw misleading information in the last week say they forwarded or shared it (vs. 7% in week one).
- The most common piece of misinformation respondents came across (from a select list) was ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’. There has been a decrease in the proportion of respondents coming across this, from 50% in week three to 35% in week eight.
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- More than a quarter (26%) of respondents agree with the statement: ‘I am confused about what I should be doing in response to Coronavirus’. This is an increase from 16% in week seven and 17% in week one. 37% of 25-34s agree with the statement compared to only 20% of over 65s.
- The NHS remains the most trusted source for information on Covid-19. More than nine in ten adults who use it for information say they trust it (93% in week eight vs. 95% in week one). A clear majority of respondents using official sources continue to trust the information provided by official scientists (88% in week eight vs. 90% in week one), local health services (88% vs. 92%), the WHO (84% vs. 94%) and the government (79% vs. 84%).
- Four in ten respondents (40%) say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about Coronavirus’, in line with results from week one (40%). Over four in ten female respondents (44%) say they find it hard to know what’s true or false, compared to 36% of male respondents. 46% of 16-34s say that they find it hard to know what is true or false, compared to 33% of over 65s.
- Nearly all respondents still say they are closely following official guidance about regular handwashing (90% in week eight vs. 96% in week one), only going outside the home for essential shopping and exercise (95% vs. 97%) and practising social distancing (97% vs. 98%).
- Nearly a quarter of respondents (24%) say they think ‘the mainstream media is exaggerating the seriousness of Coronavirus’, compared to 17% in week one. Three in ten male respondents (30%) agree with this statement, compared to 19% of female respondents. Only 19% of over 65s agree with the statement whereas a third (33%) of 24-34s agree with the statement.
- Finally, most respondents (84%) continue to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’ (vs. 86% in week one). Those aged over 65 are most likely to agree the crisis is showing positive sides to society (88%).
We have also published the following piece of analysis:
Early effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (PDF, 193.5 KB)
Week 7
We will now be publishing the key findings from this research on a fortnightly basis, with our next full report due on Tuesday 26 May. Our interactive data report will continue to be updated on a weekly basis.
We have also published the following report. In this report, ten participants from our qualitative Adults' Media Lives study were interviewed using a video conferencing platform in the early-lockdown period (30 March – 6 April 2020). Participants discussed how the lockdown was affecting them, how their media behaviour was changing and how they were staying informed at this time.
Although the sample is small, participants represented a cross-section of individuals aged 20-75 across the UK, affected by lockdown in different ways.
Adults' Media Lives: Covid-19 early lockdown interviews (PDF, 136.8 KB)
Week 6
Fieldwork took place from 1-3 May, asking people about their habits and attitudes of the previous seven days.
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- Nine in ten respondents (94%) are still accessing news about Covid-19 at least once a day (vs. 99% in week one). But less than one in ten (8%) are now accessing news about the pandemic at least twenty times a day (vs. 24% in week one).
- A third of respondents (33%) say they are ‘trying to avoid news about Coronavirus’ (vs. 22% in week one). Those aged 18-24 and 25-34 are most likely to say they are avoiding news about Covid-19 (44% of both groups). Female respondents (37%) are more likely than male respondents (29%) to say they are avoiding news on the topic.
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, newspapers, radio) remain both the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (89% in week six vs. 93% in week one,) and the most important source of news and information to users (64% in week six vs. 71% in week one). BBC services (TV, radio and online) remain the most used (77% in week six, 82% in week one,) and most important sources of information (50% in week six, 52% in week one).
- Compared to week one, use of social media as a source of information about the pandemic has decreased (38% in week six vs. 49% in week one), as has use of closed groups (9% vs. 15%). There has also been a decrease in sharing news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts (15% in week six vs. 25% in week one) or by writing in closed messenger groups (21% vs. 34%). A fifth (20%) now say they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19 either online or by word of mouth in the last week, compared 11% in week one.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- In week six, 47% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information about Covid-19 in the last week. This is slightly lower than results in week five (50%). Just 4% of those who saw misleading information in the last week say they forwarded or shared it (vs. 7% in week one).
- As in weeks four and five, the most common piece of misinformation respondents came across (from a select list) was ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’. There has been a small decrease in the proportion of respondents coming across this, from 51% in week four to 45% in week six. The number of adults who have not come across any false or misleading information (from a select list) has increased to 40% in week six vs. 37% in week five.
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- The NHS remains the most trusted source for information on Covid-19. Nine in ten adults who use it for information say they trust it (92% in week six vs. 95% in week one). A clear majority of respondents using official sources continue to trust the information provided by official scientists (91% in week six vs. 90% in week one), local health services (84% vs. 92%), the WHO (81% vs. 94%) and the government (78% vs. 84%).
- More than a third of respondents (38%) say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about Coronavirus’, in line with results from week one (40%). Over four in ten female respondents (41%) say they find it hard to know what’s true or false, compared to 34% of male respondents. 44% of 16-34s say that they find it hard to know what is true or false, compared to 33% of over 65s.
- Nearly all respondents still say they are closely following official guidance about regular handwashing (91% in week six vs. 96% in week one), only going outside the home for essential shopping and exercise (97% vs. 97%) and practising social distancing (98% vs. 98%).
- A fifth of respondents (20%) say they think ‘the mainstream media is exaggerating the seriousness of Coronavirus’, 17% in week one. Nearly a quarter of male respondents (24%) agree with this statement, compared to 15% of female respondents. Only 14% of over 65s agree with the statement whereas a quarter (25%) of both 24-34s and 35-44s agree.
- Finally, most respondents (83%) continue to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’ (vs. 86% in week one). Those aged over 65 are most likely to agree the crisis is showing positive sides to society (90%).
We have also published the following pieces of analysis:
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
- Nine in ten respondents (93%) are still accessing news about Covid-19 at least once a day (vs. 99% in week one). But just one in ten (10%) are now accessing news about the pandemic at least twenty times a day (vs. 24% in week one).
- More than a third of respondents (34%) say they are ‘trying to avoid news about Coronavirus’ (vs. 22% in week one). Those aged 18-24 and 25-34 are most likely to say they are avoiding news about Covid-19 (43% of both groups). Female respondents (38%) are more likely than male respondents (30%) to say they are avoiding news on the topic.
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, newspapers, radio) remain both the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (86% in week five, 93% in week one,) and the most important source of news and information to users (66% in week five, 71% in week one). Within the traditional media sources, BBC services (TV, radio and online) remain the most used (74% in week five, 82% in week one,) and most important sources of information (49% in week five, 52% in week one,).
- Compared to week one, use of social media as a source of information about the pandemic has decreased (34% in week five vs. 49% in week one), as has use of closed groups (7% vs. 15%). There has also been a decrease in sharing news or information about Covid-19 via social media posts (14% in week five vs. 25% in week one) or by writing in closed messenger groups (17% vs. 34%). A quarter (25%) now say they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19 either online or by word of mouth in the last week, an increase from 11% in week one.
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- In week five, 50% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information about Covid-19 in the last week. This is higher than results in week four (44%) but in line with those from week three (50%). Just 3% of those who saw misleading information in the last week say they forwarded or shared it (vs. 7% in week one).
- As in weeks three and four, the most common piece of misinformation respondents came across (from a select list) was ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’. There has been a small decrease in the proportion of respondents coming across this, from 51% in week four to 47% in week five. In week five, 9% of respondents said they had seen ‘other’ pieces of misinformation outside of those on our select list which related to ‘injecting disinfectant’ and ‘exposure to UV light’.
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- The NHS remains the most trusted source for information on Covid-19. Nine in ten adults who use it for information say they trust it (91% in week five, 95% in week one). A clear majority of respondents using official sources continue to trust the information provided by official scientists (87% in week five vs. 90% in week one), local health services (84% vs. 91%), the WHO (81% vs. 94%) and the government (78% vs. 89%).
- More than a third of respondents (36%) say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about Coronavirus’, in line with results from week four (36%). Nearly four in ten female respondents (39%) say they find it hard to know what’s true or false, compared to 32% of male respondents.
- Nearly all respondents still say they are closely following official guidance about regular handwashing (91% in week five vs. 92% in week four), only going outside the home for essential shopping and exercise (96% vs. 97%) and practising social distancing (97% vs. 98%).
- A fifth of respondents (20%) say they think ‘the mainstream media is exaggerating the seriousness of Coronavirus’, in line with results from week four (20%). Nearly a quarter of male respondents (24%) agree with this statement, compared to 17% of female respondents.
- Finally, most respondents (84%) continue to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’ (vs. 83% in week four). Those aged over 65 are most likely to agree the crisis is showing positive sides to society (92%).
We have also published the following pieces of analysis:
Results by ethnicity, using a combined dataset from weeks one to four of the survey (PDF, 262.3 KB)
Early effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (PDF, 189.0 KB)
Week 4
- Among adult internet users, traditional media sources (broadcasters, print media etc.) remain both the most-used source of news and information about Covid-19 (93% in week one, 89% in week four) and the most important source of news and information to users (71% in both weeks one and four). Within the traditional media sources, BBC services (TV, radio and online) remain the most used by some margin. Three quarters (76%) use the BBC as a source of news/information, although this is a decrease on week one (82%). BBC services also remain the most important source of information (52% in week one, 49% in week four).
- Almost all respondents are still accessing news about Covid-19 at least once a day, but this has decreased slightly (99% in week one, 96% in week four). It appears that people are not accessing news and information as frequently as in the first week of lockdown. In week one, a quarter of respondents (24%) said they were accessing news about Covid-19 twenty or more times a day, but this decreased to 17% in week two and 14% in week three. This has now decreased further to 12%.
- Furthermore, three in ten respondents (30%) now say that they are ‘trying to avoid news about Coronavirus’, up from 22% in week one and 27% in weeks two and three. Those aged 18-24 are most likely to say they are avoiding news about Covid-19 (42%).
- Compared to week one, respondents are now more likely to say they have not shared any information or news about Covid-19 in the past week (11% in week one vs. 18% in week four).
Consumption of news and information about Covid-19
Misinformation related to Covid-19
- During the fourth week of lockdown, 44% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information about Covid-19. This is lower than 50% in week three, but roughly in line with results from week two (45%) and week one (46%).
- There has been a small decrease in the proportion of respondents saying they have done something after coming across false or misleading news/information about Covid-19 (45% in week one, 41% in week four).
- As in week three, the most common piece of misinformation that people have come across in week four (from a select list) was ‘theories linking the origins or causes of Covid-19 to 5G technology’ (50% in week three, 51% in week four).
Attitudes and behaviour related to Covid-19
- The NHS remains the most trusted source for information on Covid-19. Nine in ten adults who use it for information say they trust it (93% in week four, 95% in week one). Trust in some official sources has decreased between weeks one and four, but a clear majority of respondents using these sources continue to trust the information provided by the WHO (87% in week four vs. 94% in week one), local health services (81% vs. 91%), the government (80% vs. 89%) and official scientists (78% vs. 90%).
- 36% of respondents say they ‘find it hard to know what is true and what is false about Coronavirus’, an increase from 32% in week three, but still lower than 40% in week one. Furthermore, 16% say they are ‘confused about what I should be doing in response to Coronavirus’, an increase from 12% in week three and in line with 17% in week one.
- Most respondents (83%) continue to think that ‘this crisis is showing some positive sides of society (e.g. more local/community spirit, support for the NHS)’ (vs. 84% in week three). Nearly all respondents continue to say they are closely following official guidance about regular hand washing (92% vs. 94% in week three), only going outside the home for essential shopping and exercise (97% vs. 97% in week three) and practising social distancing (98% vs. 98% in week three).
We have also published the following pieces of analysis:
Results by UK nation, using a combined dataset from weeks one to four of the survey (PDF, 526.4 KB)
Our latest analysis of TV consumption using BARB data (PDF, 191.6 KB)
Weeks 1 to 3
- Almost all of the UK online population continue to access news and information about Covid-19 at least once a day.
- BBC services are still the most used source for news and information on Covid-19.
- One in five respondents say they are not sharing information about Covid-19 – an increase since week one.
- Half of all respondents say they have come across false or misleading information.
- 50% of respondents have seen theories linking Covid-19 with 5G.
- Virtually all respondents continue to say they are following official advice on the coronavirus.
- Official sources, such as the NHS and the WHO, so far tend to be the most trusted.
- The proportion of people 'finding it hard to know what's true and what's false about Covid-19' has decreased.
- An increasing number of people agree they are 'trying to avoid news about coronavirus'.
- Respondents almost universally agree that the crisis has shown positive sides to society.
- Almost all of the UK online population are accessing news and information about Covid-19 at least once a day.
- BBC services are the most used source for news and information by some margin.
- 36% of respondents named BBC TV as their most important source for news and information.
- 46% of respondents say they have come across false or misleading information.
- 55% of people that came across false or misleading information did not take any action.
- Virtually all respondents say they are following official advice on the coronavirus.
- Official sources, such as the NHS and the WHO, tend to be the most trusted.
- 40% of respondents agree that they are 'finding it hard to know what's true and what's false about Covid-19'.
- One in five people agree they are 'trying to avoid news about the coronavirus'.
- 86% of respondents agree that the crisis has shown positive sides to society.
Week 47
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 47 data
(CSV, 5.1 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 47 data tables (XLSX, 935.7 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 47 questionnaire (PDF, 205.5 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: ethnicity data (CSV, 17.1 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: ethnicity data tables (XLSX, 903.4 KB)
Week 43
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 43 data tables (XLSX, 1003.8 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 43 data (CSV, 5.1 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 43 (PDF, 199.5 KB)
Children's News Consumption Survey: Covid-19 November/December 2020 data tables (XLSX, 134.7 KB)
Children's News Consumption Survey: Covid-19 November/December 2020 data (CSV, 161.0 KB)
Children's News Consumption Survey: Covid-19 November/December 2020 questionnaire (PDF, 137.2 KB)
Week 37
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 37 data tables (XLSX, 1.1 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 37 data (CSV, 5.2 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 37 (PDF, 211.1 KB)
Week 33
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 33 data tables (XLSX, 1004.4 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 33 data (CSV, 5.0 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 33 (PDF, 255.1 KB)
Week 29
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 29 data tables (XLSX, 999.0 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 29 data (CSV, 5.1 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 29 (PDF, 206.1 KB)
Week 25
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 25 data tables (XLSX, 986.9 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 25 data (CSV, 4.9 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 25 (PDF, 252.0 KB)
Week 20
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 20 data tables (XLSX, 554.0 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 20 data (CSV, 4.9 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 20 (PDF, 177.9 KB)
Week 14
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 14 data tables (XLSX, 546.8 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 14 data (CSV, 4.6 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 14 (PDF, 192.4 KB)
Week 13
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 13 data tables (XLSX, 543.1 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 13 data (CSV, 4.6 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 13 (PDF, 191.4 KB)
Week 12
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 12 data tables (XLSX, 547.1 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 12 data (CSV, 5.0 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 12 (PDF, 207.1 KB)
Results by UK nation, using a combined dataset from weeks nine to 12 of the survey (XLSX, 1.0 MB)
Week 11
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 11 data tables (XLSX, 548.5 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 11 data (CSV, 5.0 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – questionnaire for week 11 (PDF, 216.1 KB)
Week 10
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week ten data tables (XLSX, 549.9 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week ten data (CSV, 2.9 MB)
Week 9
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week nine data tables (XLSX, 2.4 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week nine data (CSV, 3.5 MB)
Week 8
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week eight data tables (XLSX, 434.8 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week eight data (CSV, 3.2 MB)
Week 7
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week seven data tables (XLSX, 438.4 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week seven data (CSV, 3.2 MB)
Week 6
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week six data tables (XLSX, 434.0 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week six data (CSV, 3.3 MB)
Week 5
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week five data tables (XLSX, 426.4 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week five data (CSV, 3.1 MB)
Week 4
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week four data tables (XLSX, 413.5 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week four data (CSV, 2.9 MB)
Week 3
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week three data tables (XLSX, 401.5 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week three data (CSV, 2.9 MB)
Week 2
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week two data tables (XLSX, 401.0 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week two data (CSV, 2.9 MB)
Week 1
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week one data tables (XLSX, 386.1 KB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week one data (CSV, 2.9 MB)
Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – methodology (PDF, 146.1 KB)