Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes

These findings use 3 months’ rolled data in order to be able to compare different ethnic groups and their behaviour and attitudes in relation to news and information about the coronavirus.

Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus

• During the period from July to September 2021, most White respondents (78%) and people from a minority ethnic background (78%) accessed news about the coronavirus outbreak at least once a day.
• Traditional media is the most used source by both White respondents (85%) and people from a minority ethnic background (74%).
• Half of people from a minority ethnic background (49%), including 52% of Black respondents and 49% of Asian respondents used social media as a source of news or information about coronavirus compared to three in ten White respondents (30%).  People from a minority ethnic background (48%) were twice as likely to trust information about coronavirus from social media than White respondents (22%).  People from a minority ethnic background (15%) were also more likely to share news or information about coronavirus on social media than White respondents (8%).
• One in three people from a minority ethnic background (34%) used family, friends and local people as a source compared to one in four White respondents (26%). People from a minority ethnic background (26%) were twice as likely as White respondents (12%) to say that they rely more on people they know, people in their local area or people on social media for information about coronavirus. White respondents (56%) were more likely than people from a minority ethnic background (39%) to say that they rely more on media or official sources for information about the coronavirus.
• People from a minority ethnic background (16%) are more likely than White respondents (5%) to use closed messaging services as source of news or information about coronavirus.

Misinformation related to the coronavirus

• People from a minority ethnic background (31%), including 31% of Asian respondents and 32% of Black respondents, were more likely than White respondents (25%) to say they had come across information or news about the coronavirus that could be considered false or misleading.
• People from a minority ethnic background (71%), including 74% of Asian respondents, were more likely than White respondents (43%) to do something after seeing information that could be considered false or misleading, such as fact checking (done by 28% of people from a minority ethnic background and 14% of White respondents).
• Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, people from a minority ethnic background (43%) were almost twice as likely as White respondents (23%) to agree that seeing these claims made them think twice about the issue.
• People from a minority ethnic background (45%) were more likely than White respondents (32%) to be concerned about the amount of false or misleading information they may be getting about coronavirus themselves.
• People from a minority ethnic background (21%) were more likely to agree with the statement that their ‘friends and family tend to believe these claims which some people are making about aspects of the Coronavirus that could be considered as false or misleading’ than White respondents (10%).
• People from a minority ethnic background (68%) were more likely than White respondents (55%) to come across content on social media that had warnings or notices saying that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue. When they came across these warnings or notices, 67% of people from a minority ethnic background said they clicked through to the content, compared to 52% of White respondents.
• White respondents (81%) were more likely to agree with the statement, 'I think that untrue stories or items about Coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media' than people from a minority ethnic background (74%).
• People from a minority ethnic background (28%) were more likely to agree with the statement, 'I think that people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about Coronavirus, even if it might not be true' than White respondents (19%).
• People from a minority ethnic background (25%) were more likely to agree with the statement, 'I think it’s OK for untrue stories about Coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform' than White respondents (20%).
• People from a minority ethnic background (61%) were more likely to feel ‘confident that things will go back to a situation of ‘near normal’’ than White respondents (50%).  White respondents (85%) were more likely to agree that ‘we’re just going to have to live with the Coronavirus’ than people from a minority ethnic background (66%).

Fieldwork took place from 3-4 September 2021, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. Most legal restrictions on social contact were lifted in England on 19 July 2021, in Wales on 7 August 2021 and in Scotland on 9 August 2021.

Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus

• In the last week, three quarters of people (73%) said they accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day. This was a decrease from last month (79%) and from week one (27-29 March 2020) where almost everyone accessed news about coronavirus (99%).
• Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus, used by more than eight in ten people (82%) in the last week. Of these people, 63% said it was their most important news source.
• Most social media users (79%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the Government, either each time, most times or sometimes when they used social media.
• The most common way people shared news or information about the coronavirus in the last week was by talking to family, friends or colleagues either in person or over the phone (55%). Other methods used by people to share news or information included: by writing on closed messenger groups such as WhatsApp or Zoom (11%); via social media posts (7%); and via video calls on closed messenger groups (7%). Four in ten people (38%) said they had not shared any news or information about coronavirus in the last week, an increase from last month (34%).

Misinformation related to the coronavirus

• A quarter of people (24%) said they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, a decrease from last month (27%). Those under the age of 35 were more likely to say that they had come across potentially false or misleading claims than those over the age of 35 (33% of under 35s vs. 20% of those 35+).
• A quarter of people (24%) were unsure whether or not they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (25%).
• Respondents were prompted with a list of claims which could be considered false or misleading, and 51% said they had seen at least one of the claims on the list. This had been in steady decline in the first five months of the year (63% in January, 60% in February, 57% in March, 53% in April, 49% in May); however, it increased over the summer period (50% in June, 52% in July and 59% in August).
• The most common claims seen by respondents, from the prompted list, were: ‘face masks/coverings offer no protection or are harmful’ (seen by 22% vs 28% in August*); ‘the flu alone is killing more people than coronavirus’ (19%); ‘ ‘the number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (17% vs 22% in August*); ‘the coronavirus vaccine is a cover for a plan to implant trackable microchips into people’ (15% vs 19% in August*); the coronavirus vaccine may reduce fertility (15% vs 21% in August*); ‘'the Coronavirus does not really exist and was genetically engineered’ (15%). (*statistically different than last month).
• Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in four (27%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue. This was a similar proportion to last month (25%).
• One third of respondents (34%) had concerns about the amount of false or misleading information they might be getting about the coronavirus. Six in ten respondents (60%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting.
• One in ten people said that their ‘friends and family tend to believe these claims which some people are making about aspects of the Coronavirus that could be considered as false or misleading’ (12%). Those under the age of 35 were more likely to agree with this statement than those aged 45 and over (19% of under 35s vs. 6% of those 45+). One in five people said that ‘my friends and family aren't sure what to believe about these claims’ (21%).
• Most people (80%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’. However, one in five (21%) agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’, and a similar proportion agreed that ‘people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about coronavirus, even if it might not be true’ (22%).
• Over half (58%) of social media users said that they had seen posts on social media with warnings or notices that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue, the same proportion as last month (58%). Half of these social media users (54%) also clicked through to view the content either each time, most times or sometimes when they saw these warnings, which was a similar proportion to last month (55%).
• Three quarters of people said 'we need to get back to normal as much as possible’ (73%), while half of the respondents said that they felt ‘confident that things will go back to a situation of “near normal”’(51%). However, eight in ten people said they ‘think we're just going to have to live with the Coronavirus’ (82%) and a similar proportion believed ‘we should be cautious about the Coronavirus this winter’ (81%).

Fieldwork took place from 6-8 August 2021, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. Most legal restrictions on social contact were lifted in England on 19 July 2021 and in Wales on 7 August 2021.

Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus

• In the last week, eight in ten people (79%) said they accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day. This was a similar proportion as last month (81%) and a decrease from week one (27-29 March 2020) where almost everyone accessed news about coronavirus (99%).
• Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus, used by more than eight in ten people (84%) in the last week. Of these people, 61% said it was their most important news source.
• Most social media users (81%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the Government, either each time, most times or sometimes when they used social media.
• The most common way people shared news or information about the coronavirus in the last week was by talking to family, friends or colleagues either in person or over the phone (60%). Other methods used by people to share news or information included, by writing on closed messenger groups such as WhatsApp or Zoom (12%), via social media posts (10%), and via video calls on closed messenger groups (7%). One in three people (34%) said they had not shared any news or information about coronavirus in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (33%).

Misinformation related to the coronavirus

• A quarter of people (25%) were unsure whether or not they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (27%).
• Respondents were prompted with a list of claims which could be considered false or misleading, and 59% said they had seen at least one of the claims on the list. This had been in steady decline in the first half of the year, however it has increased again since June (63% in January, 60% in February, 57% in March, 53% in April, 49% in May, 50% in June, 52% in July).
• The most common claims seen by respondents, from the prompted list, were: ‘face masks/coverings offer no protection or are harmful’ (seen by 28% vs 20% in July*); ‘the number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (22% vs. 18% in July*);  ‘the flu alone is killing more people than coronavirus’ (21%); ‘the coronavirus vaccine may reduce fertility (21% vs. 18% in July*); ‘the coronavirus vaccine is a cover for a plan to implant trackable microchips into people’ (19% vs. 15% in July*); ‘the number of cases linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (18%). (*significantly different than last month).
• Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in four (25%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue. This was a similar proportion to last month (26%).
• One third of respondents (34%) had concerns about the amount of false or misleading information they might be getting about the coronavirus. Six in ten respondents (61%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting.
• Most people (80%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’. However, one in five (19%) agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’, and a similar proportion agreed that ‘people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about coronavirus, even if it might not be true’ (20%).
• Over half (58%) of social media users said that they had seen posts on social media with warnings or notices that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue, a similar proportion to last month (57%). Half of these social media users (55%) also clicked through to view the content either each time, most times or sometimes when they saw these warnings, which was the same as last month (55%).

Fieldwork took place from 2-4 July 2021, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days.

Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus

• In the last week, eight in ten people (81%) said they accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day. This was the same proportion as last month (81%) and a decrease from week one (27-29 March 2020) where almost everyone accessed news about coronavirus (99%).
• Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus, used by more than eight in ten people (84%) in the last week. Of these people, 62% said it was their most important news source.
• Most social media users (82%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the Government, either each time, most times or sometimes when they used social media.
• The most common way people shared news or information about the coronavirus in the last week was by talking to family, friends or colleagues either in person or over the phone (61%). Other methods used by people to share news or information included, by writing on closed messenger groups such as WhatsApp or Zoom (12% vs 10% in June), via video calls on closed messenger groups (7%), and via social media posts (9%). One in three people (33%) said they had not shared any news or information about coronavirus in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (32%).

Misinformation related to the coronavirus

• A quarter of people (25%) said they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, the same as last month (25%). Those under the age of 35 were more likely to say that they had come across potentially false or misleading claims than those over the age of 35 (30% of under 35s vs. 24% of over 35s).
• Over one quarter of people (27%) were unsure whether or not they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (29%).
• Respondents were prompted with a list of claims which could be considered false or misleading, and 52% said they had seen at least one of the claims on the list. This has been in steady decline since January, although it is a similar proportion to last month (63% in January, 60% in February, 57% in March, 53% in April, 49% in May, 50% in June).
• The most common claims seen by respondents, from the prompted list, were: ‘face masks/coverings offer no protection or are harmful’ (seen by 20% of respondents); ‘the flu alone is killing more people than coronavirus’ (20%); ‘the number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (18%); ‘the coronavirus vaccine may reduce fertility (18%); ‘the number of cases linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (16%); ‘the coronavirus vaccine is a cover for a plan to implant trackable microchips into people’ (15%).
• Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in four (26%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue. This was the same as last month (26%).
• One third of respondents (33%) had concerns about the amount of false or misleading information they might be getting about the coronavirus. Nearly six in ten respondents (57%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting.
• Most people (79%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’. However, one in five (21%) agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’, and a similar proportion agreed that ‘people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about coronavirus, even if it might not be true’ (22%).
• Over half (57%) of social media users said that they had seen posts on social media with warnings or notices that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue, a similar proportion to last month (56%). Half of these social media users (56%) also clicked through to view the content either each time, most times or sometimes when they saw these warnings, which was a similar proportion as last month (55%).

Fieldwork took place from 4-6 June 2021, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. This followed the easing of some lockdown restrictions across the UK on 17 May.

Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus

• In the last week, eight in ten people (81%) said they accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day. This was the same proportion as last month (81%) and a decrease from week one (27-29 March 2020) where almost everyone accessed news about coronavirus (99%).
• Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus, used by more than eight in ten people (82%) in the last week. Of these people, 64% said it was their most important news source.
• Most social media users (82%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the Government, either each time, most times or sometimes when they used social media.
• The most common way people shared news or information about the coronavirus in the last week was by talking to family, friends or colleagues either in person or over the phone (62%). Other methods used by people to share news or information included, by writing on closed messenger groups such as WhatsApp or Zoom (10%), via video calls on closed messenger groups (7%), and via social media posts (9%). One in three people (32%) said they had not shared any news or information about coronavirus in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (33%).

Misinformation related to the coronavirus

• A quarter of people (25%) said they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week. This was an increase from last month (22%). Those under the age of 35 were more likely than average to say that they had come across potentially false or misleading claims (33% of under 35s vs. 22% of over 35s).
• Three in ten people (29%) were unsure whether or not they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, an increase from last month (23%).
• Respondents were prompted with a list of claims which could be considered false or misleading, and 50% said they had seen at least one of the claims on the list. This has been in steady decline since January, although it is a similar proportion to last month (63% in January, 60% in February, 57% in March, 53% in April and 49% in May).
• The most common claims seen by respondents, from the prompted list, were: ‘face masks/coverings offer no protection or are harmful’ (seen by 19% of respondents); ‘the coronavirus vaccine is a cover for a plan to implant trackable microchips into people’ (17%) ; ‘the number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (16%); ‘the flu alone is killing more people than coronavirus’ (15%); ‘the coronavirus vaccine may reduce fertility (15%); ‘the number of cases linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (14%).
• Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in four (26%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue. This was a similar proportion to last month (27%).
• Three in ten respondents (31%) had concerns about the amount of false or misleading information they might be getting about the coronavirus. Six in ten respondents (59%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting.
• Most people (81%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’. However, one in five (20%) agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’, and the same proportion agreed that ‘people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about coronavirus, even if it might not be true’.
• Over half (56%) of social media users said that they had seen posts on social media with warnings or notices that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue, a similar proportion to last month (53%). Half of these social media users (55%) also clicked through to view the content either each time, most times or sometimes when they saw these warnings, which was a similar proportion as last month (54%).

Fieldwork took place from 7-9 May 2021, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. This followed the easing of some lockdown restrictions across the UK, with outdoor hospitality and retail reopening in England from 12 April and the reopening of gyms and leisure centres in Wales from 3 May. It was just before the further easing of lockdown restrictions in England and Scotland on 17 May, when indoor hospitality re-opened and indoor gatherings were allowed for groups of six or two households.

Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus

• In the last week, eight in ten people (81%) said they accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day. This was a decline from last month (85%) and from week one (27-29 March 2020) where almost everyone accessed news about coronavirus (99%).
• Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus, used by more than eight in ten people (83%) in the last week. Of these people, 62% said it was their most important news source.
• Most social media users (80%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the Government, either each time, most times or sometimes when they used social media.
• The most common way people shared news or information about the coronavirus in the last week was by talking to family, friends or colleagues either in person or over the phone (61%), which was a decline from last month (66%). Other methods used by people to share  news or information had also declined from last month, including by writing on closed messenger groups such as WhatsApp or Zoom (12% vs. 16% in April), via video calls on closed messenger groups (7% vs. 11% in April) and via social media posts (9% vs 11% in April). One in three people (33%) said they had not shared any news or information about coronavirus in the last week, an increase from last month (27%).

Misinformation related to the coronavirus

• Two in ten people (22%) said they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week. This was a decline from last month (28%). Those under the age of 35 were more likely than average to say that they had come across false or misleading claims (29% of under 35s vs. 18% of over 45s).
• One in four people (23%) were unsure whether or not they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (24%).
• Respondents were prompted with a list of claims which could be considered false or misleading, and 49% said they had seen at least one of the claims on the list. This has been in steady decline since January (63% in January, 60% in February, 57% in March and 53% in April).
• The most common claims seen by respondents, from the prompted list, were: ‘face masks/coverings offer no protection or are harmful’ (seen by 20% of respondents); ‘the number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (19%); ‘the flu alone is killing more people than coronavirus’ (19%); ‘the number of cases linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (15%); ‘the coronavirus vaccine is a cover for a plan to implant trackable microchips into people’ (14%) and ‘the coronavirus vaccine will alter human DNA’ (14%).
• Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in four (27%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue. This was a similar proportion to last month (25%).
• One third of respondents (32%) had concerns about the amount of false or misleading information they might be getting about the coronavirus. Six in ten respondents (58%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting.
• Most people (81%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’. However, one in five (21%) agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’, and the same proportion agreed that ‘people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about coronavirus, even if it might not be true’.
• Half (53%) of social media users said that they had seen posts on social media with warnings or notices that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue, a similar proportion to last month (54%). Half of these social media users (54%) also clicked through to view the content either each time, most times or sometimes when they saw these warnings which was a similar proportion as last month (52%).

Fieldwork took place from 9-11 April 2021, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. This followed the easing of some lockdown restrictions across the UK, with outdoor gatherings allowed for groups of six or two households in England from 29 March. It was just before the further easing of lockdown restrictions in England on 12 April, when all retail was allowed to re-open.

Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus

• In the last week, over eight in ten people (85%) said they accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day. This was a similar proportion to last month (84%). News access was highest in March 2020 (99%).
• Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus, used by more than eight in ten people (85%) in the last week. Of these people, 62% said it was their most important news source.
• Most social media users (83%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the Government, either each time, most times or sometimes when they used social media.
• The most common way people shared news or information about the coronavirus in the last week was by talking to family, friends or colleagues either in person or over the phone (66%). People also shared this news or information by writing on closed messenger groups such as Whatsapp or Zoom (16%), via video calls on closed messenger groups (11%) and via social media posts (11%).

Misinformation related to the coronavirus

• Three in ten people (28%) said they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, the same proportion as last month. Those aged 18-24 were more likely than average to say that they had come across false or misleading claims (35% of 18-24s vs. 24% of over 45s).
• One in four people (24%) were unsure whether or not they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (25%).
• Respondents were prompted with a list of claims which could be considered false or misleading, and 53% said they had seen at least one of the claims on the list. This has been in steady decline since January (63% in January, 60% in February and 57% in March).
• The most common claims seen by respondents, from the prompted list, were: ‘face masks/coverings offer no protection or are harmful’ (seen by 21% of respondents); ‘the number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (18%); ‘the flu alone is killing more people than coronavirus’ (18%); ‘the number of cases linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (16%); ‘the coronavirus vaccine may reduce fertility’ (16%); and ‘the coronavirus vaccine is a cover for a plan to implant trackable microchips into people’ (16%).
• Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in four (25%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue. This was a similar proportion as last month (23%).
• One third of respondents (32%) had concerns about the amount of false or misleading information they might be getting about the coronavirus. Six in ten respondents (59%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting.
• Most people (79%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’. However, one in five (21%) agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’, and the same proportion agreed that ‘people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about coronavirus, even if it might not be true’.
• Half (54%) of social media users said that they had seen posts on social media with warnings or notices that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue, a similar proportion to last month (52%). Half of these social media users (52%) also clicked through to view the content either each time, most times or sometimes when they saw these warnings which was a similar proportion as last month (53%).

Fieldwork took place 12-14 March, asking people about their habits and attitudes in the previous seven days. This week marked one year since the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared that the outbreak of the coronavirus was a global pandemic, and it also saw the return of most children across the UK to school.

Consumption of news and information about the coronavirus

• In the last week, over eight in ten people (84%) said they accessed news about the coronavirus at least once a day. This was a decrease from last month (88%) and from week one (99%).
• Traditional media has remained the most-used source of news and information about the coronavirus, used by nearly nine in ten people (86%) in the last week. Of these people, 63% said it was their most important news source.
• Most social media users (84%) said that they had seen banners, pop-ups and upfront notices about the coronavirus from official sources, such as health organisations or the government, either each time, most times or sometimes when they used social media.
• The most common way people shared news or information about the coronavirus in the last week was by talking to family, friends or colleagues either in person or over the phone (67%). People also shared this news or information via closed messenger groups such as Whatsapp or Zoom (15%), via video calls on closed messenger groups (12%) and via social media posts (11%).

Misinformation related to the coronavirus

• Three in ten people (28%) said they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (29%). Those under the age of 35 were more likely than average to say that they had come across false or misleading claims (35% of under 35s vs. 24% of over 35s).
• One in four people (25%) were unsure whether or not they had come across claims about the coronavirus which could be considered false or misleading in the last week, a similar proportion to last month (27%).
• Respondents were prompted with a list of claims which could be considered false or misleading, and 57% said they had seen at least one of the claims on the list. This has been in steady decline since January (63% in January, 60% in February).
• The most common claims seen by respondents, from the prompted list, were: ‘face masks/coverings offer no protection or are harmful’ (seen by 23% of respondents); ‘the number of deaths linked to coronavirus is much lower in reality than is being reported’ (21%); ‘the coronavirus vaccine may reduce fertility’ (18%); and ‘the coronavirus vaccine is a cover for a plan to implant trackable microchips into people’ (17%).
• Where respondents had seen claims that could be considered false or misleading, one in four (23%) said that seeing these claims had made them think twice about the issue. This was the same proportion as last month.
• One third of respondents (32%) had concerns about the amount of false or misleading information they might be getting about the coronavirus. Almost twice as many (61%) had concerns about the amount of misinformation other people may be getting.
• Most people (81%) agreed that ‘untrue stories about the coronavirus should not be posted or shared on social media’. However, one in five (20%) also agreed that ‘it’s OK for untrue stories about the coronavirus to be posted and shared on social media, as long as they are flagged as potentially untrustworthy/untrue by the social media platform’, and the same proportion (20%) agreed that ‘people and organisations have a right to say what they want on social media about coronavirus, even if it might not be true’.
• Half (52%) of social media users said that they had seen posts on social media with warnings or notices that the information may be untrustworthy or untrue, a similar proportion to last month (55%). Half of these social media users (53%) also clicked through to view the content either each time, most times or sometimes when they saw these warnings which was the same proportion as last month (53%).

Week 76

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 76 data tables (CSV, 4.5 MB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 76 data (XLSX, 899.2 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 76 questionnaire (PDF, 177.3 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – weeks 67-76 data (CSV, 15.7 MB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – weeks 67-76 ethnicity data tables (XLSX, 664.2 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – weeks 67-76 nations data tables (XLSX, 874.5 KB)

Week 72

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 72 data (CSV, 4.2 MB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 72 data tables (XLSX, 911.5 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 72 questionnaire (PDF, 188.0 KB)

Week 67

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 67 data (CSV, 4.2 MB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 67 data tables (XLSX, 879.5 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 67 questionnaire (PDF, 170.4 KB)

Week 63

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 63 data (CSV, 4.3 MB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 63 data tables (XLSX, 867.0 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 63 questionnaire (PDF, 195.2 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – weeks 55-63 data (CSV, 13.1 MB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – weeks 55-63 ethnicity data tables (XLSX, 730.2 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – weeks 55-63 nations data tables (XLSX, 933.9 KB)

Week 59

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 59 data (CSV, 4.2 MB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 59 data tables (XLSX, 864.5 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 59 questionnaire (PDF, 174.6 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: ethnicity data tables week 43-51 (XLSX, 876.0 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: nations data tables week 43-51 (XLSX, 1.1 MB)

Week 55

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 55 data (CSV, 5.3 MB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 55 data tables (XLSX, 977.5 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 55 questionnaire  (PDF, 185.8 KB)

Children's News Consumption Survey: Covid-19 March 2021 data  (CSV, 330.7 KB)

Children's News Consumption Survey: Covid-19 March 2021 data tables (XLSX, 99.8 KB)

Children's News Consumption Survey: Covid-19 March 2021 questionnaire (PDF, 168.1 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: nations data tables week 29-37 (XLSX, 1.1 MB)

Week 51

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 51 data (CSV, 5.3 MB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 51 data tables (XLSX, 955.4 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – week 51 questionnaire (PDF, 228.6 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (February 2021) (PDF, 235.1 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (February 2021) (PDF, 497.9 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (January 2021) (PDF, 259.4 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (January 2021) (PDF, 557.7 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (December 2020) (PDF, 219.8 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (December 2020) (PDF, 394.2 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (November 2020) (PDF, 422.9 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (November 2020) (PDF, 194.3 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (October 2020) (PDF, 363.4 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (October 2020) (PDF, 217.8 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (September 2020) (PDF, 495.4 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (September 2020) (PDF, 205.4 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (July 2020) (PDF, 193.5 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (June 2020) (PDF, 240.8 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on TV viewing (May 2020) (PDF, 193.5 KB)

Effects of Covid-19 on online consumption (April 2020) (PDF, 189.0 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – BARB charts (April 2020) (PDF, 191.6 KB)

Covid-19 news and information: consumption and attitudes – BARB charts (March 2020) (PDF, 287.2 KB)

We have conducted analysis looking at the proportion of UK adults who are digitally excluded, including those who do not use the internet or have access to the internet at home, or have access to any connected devices. This analysis looks at the likelihood of digital exclusion by a number of different characteristics including; age, living alone, having a condition that limits or impairs their use of communications services, being financially vulnerable, and having more than one of these characteristics. We also provide population estimates based on the analysis, which are provided as a range, with a lower and upper bound.

This analysis was conducted using Ofcom’s Use of communication services, consumer omnibus. This survey tracks the access and use of communications devices and services among non-disabled and disabled consumers, and monitoring disabled consumers’ limitations and preventions of use caused by their disability.

Use of communication services, consumer omnibus: digital exclusion analysis (XLSX, 24.2 KB)

Use of communication services, consumer omnibus: digital exclusion analysis – population estimates (XLSX, 45.8 KB)

Use of communication services, consumer omnibus: digital exclusion analysis: respondent level data (CSV, 3.0 MB)

Use of communication services, consumer omnibus: digital exclusion analysis: respondent level data (SPSS) (SAV, 829.3 KB)